Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Why Google+ Might Be Doomed From the Start

This blog was written buy a guy I know from twitter, EAv, and the android community. I share his concerns and really hope he is wrong. I can understand the first wave of invites being relatively small to make sure everything works at speed, but it is essential that those who WANT to use the service are able to, and SOON.

Why Google+ Might Be Doomed From the Start: "

Before I say anything, I want to go on record saying that Google+ looks amazing, and I seriously hope that it takes off and doesn’t go the way of Google Wave. However, Google’s VIP only approach for the initial release of Google+ might doom it just like it doomed Wave.


While I understand the need for beta periods, keeping them private is not something you can do with a social network. The loss of hype is what killed Wave, and Wave lost hype because it was in a invite-only stage for so very long (probably because Google announced it at Google I/O and then stopped caring, but that’s beside the point). When you announce a product, people will want to try it out immediately. If they don’t get a chance to get their hands on it, odds are they will walk away, never to return.


Once again, I really hope Google+ does well, and I can’t wait for a chance to try it out. I simply believe that private betas just don’t work for social networks.


Google+ Is Google's Social Network with Group Video Chat, Mobile Messaging, and Easy Sharing [Video]

A few years ago I didn't expect much from google. I knew there were cool betas but I seldom got in. THEN, a CR-48 Magically appeared on my doorstep one day, a few months later I received a Google music invite. After all of this had happened I felt like I was on the A list (or Glist) and when Google+ was announced I thoroughly expected an invite. To date, I have no such invite. Google, I thought you loved me. I thought we had something special... An invite now would make it all better.

Google+ Is Google's Social Network with Group Video Chat, Mobile Messaging, and Easy Sharing [Video]: "



We've been hearing rumors about an upcoming Google-based social network for months, and Google's finally delivered. Their social project works similarly to other popular networks, but with innovative new additions like group video chatting, group messaging, and a much easier to use interface. More »






Tuesday, June 28, 2011

How Much Data Will Humans Create & Store This Year? [INFOGRAPHIC]

I am always amazed by the uniquely efficient way in which inforgrams can provide perspective on relative sizes.

How Much Data Will Humans Create & Store This Year? [INFOGRAPHIC]: "
If you’ve spent any amount time watching your Facebook or Twitter feed stream by, it should be obvious that the world is creating a lot of data. But because all that data is really just a collection of ones and zeros it can be hard to actually visualize how much is really there.
Sure, we can put a number on it, like 1.8 zettabytes being created and replicated (as in copied to DVDs and shared in the cloud) this year alone — a number that doubles every two years, according to a recent study by IDC and EMC. But how much is that, really? Not only is data itself ethereal and hard to visualize, but the numbers are so gargantuan that they quickly become too abstract to grasp.
One way to put it all into perspective is to hypothetically plug all that data into physical objects we all recognize. That 1.8 zettabytes of data, for example, would require 57.5 billion 32 GB iPads to store. How much is that? About $34.4 trillion worth. That’s equivalent to the GDP of the United States, Japan, China, Germany, France, the United Kingdom and Italy combined. And that’s how much data we’ll create and store just this year.
The infographic below contains a few more mind-blowing comparisons to help you make sense of the numbers.

Click to enlarge




Image by Sasha McCune

Freudian Click

I like it!

Freudian Click: Sending an email to someone by mistake.

A second after I hit "send", I realized that I had made a Freudian Click and emailed a love note to my ex instead of my boyfriend. So embarrassing!

Monday, June 27, 2011

Tokyo researchers hijack your hand, help you play the koto (video)

This is amazing stuff. Things like this and brain wave communication excite me to no end!

Tokyo researchers hijack your hand, help you play the koto (video): "


Researchers over in the land of the robot-obsessed have found a new, non-invasive way to control your hand while your brain recoils in horror. Reassuringly named the PossessedHand, this belt of electro-stimulation wraps its pad of twenty-eight electrodes around your forearm triggering a range of sixteen bewitched joint actions. Project leader Emi Tamaki claims it feels more like a light massage than say, a full-on Freejack. However, one test subject confessed, '[It was] like my body was hacked' -- so that's comforting. This joint production between the University of Tokyo's Rekimoto Lab and Sony Computer Science Laboratories was first tested as a musical training aide, but could someday help stroke victims regain mobility. For now, the stimulation isn't strong enough to turn you into an automated Steve Vai (or secret assassin), but it definitely lends new meaning to 'hands-off.' Check the video after the break for a demonstration and some unsettling narration.
Continue reading Tokyo researchers hijack your hand, help you play the koto (video)
Tokyo researchers hijack your hand, help you play the koto (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:01:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Hofstadter

XKCD is the amazing webcomic written by Randall Munroe. More everyone who considers themselves active on the web has heard of him and loves his stuff. I <3 XKCD.


Hofstadter"This is the reference implementation of the self-referential joke."

Saturday, June 25, 2011

Inspired By Wikipedia, Quora Aims For Relevancy With Topic Groups And Reorganized Topic Pages

Quora has the potential to be a really great service. There is really no other forum where you can get such poignant responses from founders, co-founders, executives, authors and the like. As the service grows there may be an issue of individuals being represented by others in their organization which would threaten the "genuine" nature of the service, but for now It provides a structured forum where individuals can discuss issues as well as gather insight from insiders.

Inspired By Wikipedia, Quora Aims For Relevancy With Topic Groups And Reorganized Topic Pages: "


Quora has just announced a redesign of its Topic Pages and the introduction of Topic Groups, aiming to make information discovery and navigation on the site a little bit easier. The motivation behind these changes is a thrust towards ease of search and content relevancy on Quora, as there is currently a ton of content on the site that people need to figure out how to navigate.

Now, instead of a chronological stream on Topics Pages (which you can get to via the tags in questions), users will see Best Questions, Open Questions as well as Featured Questions and Frequently Asked Questions depending on the topic.

A Topic Page can also correspond to a Topic Group which will be focused on all the activity on the Topic Page and can roll up multiple topics into one, giving users a way to self-organize and share info. For example this Movies Group corresponds to this Movies Page.

Quora co-founder Adam D’Angelo likens the difference between and Topic Page and a Topic Group to the difference between a Wikipedia article and a Wikipedia Talk page, where the Talk page features the activity of a group behind the page that is committed to the topic, moderates questions and features content. The page is just an outpost of the total sum of the group’s knowledge.

“If you’re someone who doesn’t know about a topic, now you can get a general overview of what the topic is about on a Topic Page,” D’Angelo tells me, saying that the Topic Groups will be the space for people who want to delve deeper.

Some Topic Groups will be official (you can see a list here) i.e. moderated by a group of admins with topical expertise, while others will simply consist of all incoming activity to a Topic Page.



D’Angelo writes, “We’ve had a lot of activity on Quora recently with screenwriters and other people in Hollywood. Now there’s a well-defined space for them to focus on movies without being distracted or interrupted with everything else that they’re interested in on Quora. In general, this structure will let us have deeper communities and topic areas.”

Says power Quora user Semil Shah, “[On Wikipedia] you have topics and you move from page to page, like nodes. Here, in Quora, the topics are organized in a way one can eventually drill down and explore, investigate. It’s genius.”

Despite having no user numbers to announce, D’Angelo tells me that the design and organizational changes were the result of having to look closely at what worked and what didn’t after Quora grew faster than expected last winter. The service’s eventual goal is to get more knowledge on to the Internet, get more questions and get more answers, D’Angelo said.

Also in the information discovery and relevancy vein but on the opposite end of the spectrum is the delightful newly launched Quora Shuffle Button, which lets users view random content on Quora a la StumbleUpon. You can find the unassuming Shuffle button at the bottom of each Quora page. Baby steps.

Friday, June 24, 2011

Obama, off the record

I did like the presidents speech, but this is how it should have went down.


undefined: undefined »

A Camera That Couldn’t Care Less About Focus: Introducing Lytro

This is some pretty amazing new photography tech. By capturing the entire light field of a shot you are able to manipulate the focal point of the photo after the fact. This crazy!

A Camera That Couldn’t Care Less About Focus: Introducing Lytro: "


Remember cameras that would have to focus themselves before taking a snapshot? And how that could lose vital seconds, making a mockery of the term “point and shoot”?

Oh, right — that would describe every digital camera currently on the market. But if one Silicon Valley startup has its way, the very idea of focusing, or adjusting light levels, or having to wait before you click the shutter, will be a relic of the early 21st century — along, perhaps, with photos that only exist in two dimensions.

Lytro is the brainchild of Dr. Ren Ng, a Stanford Ph.D whose dissertation on light-field technology five years ago was showered with awards. Now, with the help of $50 million in funding, most of it from Andreessen Horowitz, Ng has built a company that’s preparing to launch a focus-free digital camera later this year.

The basic premise of Lytro’s technology is pretty simple: The camera captures all the information it possibly can about the field of light in front of it. You then get a digital photo that is adjustable in an almost infinite number of ways. You can focus anywhere in the picture, change the light levels — and presuming you’re using a device with a 3-D ready screen — even create a picture you can tilt and shift in three dimensions. (I got a demonstration of the camera’s 3-D photos on a laptop and was blown away.)

You might think that this would produce unfeasibly large digital files, but Ng insists that the files will be roughly comparable to the average size of a digital photo today. The heavy lifting is being done by the camera’s on-board processors, he says. And because its light sensor is incredibly sensitive, you can capture low-light situations like restaurants a lot more easily — even without the flash.

Although the camera itself isn’t due out until late 2011, Lytro on Tuesday unveiled a carousel of demonstration snapshots — all of them embeddable, available in Flash for the web and HTML5 for your smartphone. Here’s an example. Click anywhere on the picture to change the focus, double-click to zoom.



Remind you of Instagram‘s tilt-shift feature, perhaps? Sure — except when you realize that Instagram can only focus on one area of the screen at a time. See how the chain link fence snaps in and out of focus? That’s how you know it’s a picture with a whole lot of light field information in it.

And the cost of this camera? Ng says it will be comparable to other consumer-priced digital cameras on the market. If the end result is anything like these demonstration photos, the $40 billion camera market is about to meet a whole lot of disruption.

More About: camera, digital cameras, imaging, light field, Lytro, photography, Stanford

For more Tech & Gadgets coverage:






"

WTD 1260

I do this EVERY time the power goes out!


WTD 1260: ""

Thursday, June 23, 2011

Here We Go!

And now that EAv has verified my blog my posts and your comments will all count toward my share price and activity level. I am really excited to start blogging here!

HORRAY!!

{EAV_BLOG_VER:de71c1d8ed5e615b}

This blog has finally been connected and fully endorsed on EAv. That means to expect a more constant stream of posts.

Kanye West - Monster ft. Nicki Minaj Parody! Key of Awesome #33!

Key Of Awesome has to be one of the funniest channels on YouTube. This video is especially good. The cookie monster cameo makes this video!

Kanye West - Monster ft. Nicki Minaj Parody! Key of Awesome #33!: "
I liked a YouTube video: Kanye, Rick Ross, Jay-Z, & Nicki Minaj in The Key of Awesome #33.

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

4 Fascinating Facts You Might Not Know About Carl Jung

After taking psychology of religion from a jungian Unitarian minister, none of this was news to me.

4 Fascinating Facts You Might Not Know About Carl Jung: "

4 Fascinating Facts You Might Not Know About Carl JungIn case you missed it, June 6th, 2011 marked the 50th anniversary of Swiss psychiatrist Carl Jung’s passing. Jung, born July 26, 1875, is one of the most compelling figures in psychology.


Many people are familiar with Jung for his famous friendship and eventual split from Sigmund Freud, who considered their relationship at first to be one of father and son. Jung strongly disagreed with Freud’s sole emphasis on sex and other parts of his theories, and their relationship soon deteriorated. However, the two pioneers did agree on one thing: an individual must analyze his mind’s inner workings, including his dreams and fantasies.


Jung founded analytical psychology, which emphasizes the importance of exploring both conscious and unconscious processes. According to one of his theories, all humans share a collective unconscious. Unlike the personal unconscious, which is made up of each individual’s personal memories and personality, the collective unconscious holds the experiences of our ancestors. Proof of this can be seen, according to Jung, in mythology, which shares similar themes across cultures.


Below are four other tidbits you might not know about the man behind some of the most fascinating and controversial theories.



1. Jung coined the terms introvert and extravert.


Jung believed that there are two main attitudes that people use to approach the world, which he called introvert and extravert. People aren’t either an introvert or an extravert. All of us are usually a mix of both, but one type is more dominant than the other.


According to author Frieda Fordham in An Introduction to Jung’s Psychology:


“… Jung distinguishes two differing attitudes to life, two modes of reacting to circumstances which he finds sufficiently marked and widespread to describe as typical. [...]


The extraverted attitude, characterized by an outward flowing of libido, an interest in events, in people and things, a relationship with them, and a dependence on them; when this attitude is habitual to anyone, Jung describes him or her as an extraverted type. This type is motivated by outside factors and greatly influenced by the environment. The extraverted type is sociable and confident in unfamiliar surroundings. He or she is generally on good terms with the world, and even when disagreeing with it can still be described as related to it, for instead of withdrawing (as the opposite type tends to do) they prefer to argue and quarrel, or try to reshape it according to their own pattern.


The introverted attitude, in contrast, is one of withdrawal the libido flows inward and is concentrated upon subjective factors, and the predominating influence is ‘inner necessity’. When this attitude is habitual Jung speaks of an ‘introverted type’. This type lacks confidence in relation to people and things, tends to be unsociable, and prefers reflection to activity. Each type undervalues the other, seeing the negative rather than the positive qualities of the opposite attitude, a fact which has led to endless misunderstanding and, even in the course of time, to the formulation of antagonistic philosophies, conflicting psychologies, and different values and ways of life.”


2. Jung’s doctoral dissertation explored the occult.


In 1902, Jung published his dissertation “On the Psychology and Pathology of So-Called Occult Phenomena,” while working at the Burghölzli Psychiatric Clinic under Eugen Bleuler (who coined the term schizophrenia.)


In it, Jung analyzed the séances of a 15-year-old medium, which he actually attended. In The Portable Jung, editor Joseph Campbell recounts an interesting anecdote of how Jung first came into contact with the medium:


“He was in his room, studying, with the door half open to the dining room, where his widowed mother was knitting by the window, when a loud report sounded, like a pistol shot, and the circular walnut table beside her split from the rim beyond the center—a table of solid walnut, dried and seasoned for some seventy years. Two weeks later, the young medical student, returning home at evening, found his mother, his fourteen-year-old sister, and the maid in high agitation. About an hour earlier, another deafening crack had come from the neighborhood of a heavy nineteenth-century sideboard, which the women had then examined without finding any sign. Nearby, in the cupboard containing the breadbasket, however, Jung discovered the breadknife with its steel blade broken to pieces: in one corner of the basket, its handle; in each of the others, a fraction of the blade…


A few weeks later he learned of certain relatives engaged in table-turning, who had a medium, a young girl of fifteen and a half, who produced somnambulistic states and spiritualistic phenomena. Invited to participate, Jung immediately conjectured that the manifestations in his mother’s house might be connected with that medium. He joined the sessions, and for the next two years, meticulously took notes, until, in the end, the medium, feeling her powers failing, began to cheat, and Jung departed.”


According to The Guardian, this work “laid the foundations for two key ideas in his thought. First, that the unconscious contains part-personalities, called complexes. One way in which they can reveal themselves is in occult phenomena. Second, most of the work of personality development is done at the unconscious level.”


(Read the paper for yourself.)


3. Jung’s personality theory contributed to the Myers-Briggs inventory.


In 1921, Jung published the book Psychological Types, where he laid out his theory of personality. He believed that each person has a psychological type. He wrote “what appears to be random behavior is actually the result of differences in the way people prefer to use their mental capacities.” Some people, he observed, mainly take in information, which he called perceiving, while others mainly organize it and draw conclusions, which he called judging.


He also believed that there are four psychological functions:



  • Thinking asks the question “What does it mean?” This involves making judgments and decisions.

  • Feeling asks the question “What value does this have?” Feeling, for instance, may be judging right versus wrong.

  • Sensation asks “What exactly am I perceiving? This involves how we perceive the world and gather information using our different senses.

  • Intuition asks “What might happen, what is possible?” This refers to how perception relates to things like goals and past experiences.


Inspired by his work, Isabel Myers and her mother Katharine Cook Briggs created the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator based on Jung’s ideas. They developed the personality measure in the 1940s. The Myers-Briggs consists of 16 personality types. Participants respond to 125 questions and are then placed in one of these categories.


4. Jung wrote what the New York Times called “the Holy Grail of the Unconscious.”


Jung spent 16 years writing and illustrating his Liber Novus (Latin for New Book), which is now known as the Red Book. In it, Jung delves deeply into his own unconscious, resulting in a half journal half mythological exploration.


Tucked away in a Swiss bank vault, the original copy remained unpublished until 2009. Before its publication, the Red Book had only been seen by a handful of people. According to NPR, “It took Jungian scholar Dr. Sonu Shamdasani three years to convince Jung’s family to bring the book out of hiding. It took another 13 years to translate it.”


(Readers can purchase the 416-page work on websites such as Amazon.)


According to the article:


“Jung recorded it all. First taking notes in a series of small, black journals, he then expounded upon and analyzed his fantasies, writing in a regal, prophetic tone in the big red-leather book. The book detailed an unabashedly psychedelic voyage through his own mind, a vaguely Homeric progression of encounters with strange people taking place in a curious, shifting dreamscape. Writing in German, he filled 205 oversize pages with elaborate calligraphy and with richly hued, staggeringly detailed paintings.


What he wrote did not belong to his previous canon of dispassionate, academic essays on psychiatry. Nor was it a straightforward diary. It did not mention his wife, or his children, or his colleagues, nor for that matter did it use any psychiatric language at all. Instead, the book was a kind of phantasmagoric morality play, driven by Jung’s own wish not just to chart a course out of the mangrove swamp of his inner world but also to take some of its riches with him. It was this last part — the idea that a person might move beneficially between the poles of the rational and irrational, the light and the dark, the conscious and the unconscious — that provided the germ for his later work and for what analytical psychology would become.


The book tells the story of Jung trying to face down his own demons as they emerged from the shadows. The results are humiliating, sometimes unsavory. In it, Jung travels the land of the dead, falls in love with a woman he later realizes is his sister, gets squeezed by a giant serpent and, in one terrifying moment, eats the liver of a little child. (‘I swallow with desperate efforts — it is impossible — once again and once again — I almost faint — it is done.’) At one point, even the devil criticizes Jung as hateful.”


Read the fascinating New York Times article about the Red Book’s long and complex journey to publication here. And you can read an excerpt from the book on NPR.

"

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Who’s Winning: Walmart or Amazon? [INFOGRAPHIC]

Infographs are awesome! This one explains the comparative size of two of Americas biggest corporations. The main point of this graph is the fact that Amazon is getting ready to take a lead. While this will have far reaching effect, its biggest effect may be on tax revenue. Currently the government doesn't tax online sales transactions. In most cases these transactions are replacing those that once took place IRL and were taxed. I think that in the near future this will become a huge political issue.



Who’s Winning: Walmart or Amazon? [INFOGRAPHIC]





If one online retailer could ever challenge big-box retailer Walmart, it would be Amazon.com.
Amazon already surpasses Walmart in areas such as customer service ranking, acquisitions, online presence and — believe it or not — prices.
The biggest area where Walmart is still ahead by leaps and bounds is overall revenue. The retail giant bags more than $408 billion annually, while Amazon takes $34 billion. But Amazon is projected to close that gap by 2024, which is still admittedly a long way off.
And Walmart is still much bigger than Amazon in terms of sheer size and reach. With more than 2 million employees and a customer base of 200 million people each week — that’s one out of ever seven consumers in the market — Walmart is by far the heavyweight in this matchup.
Here’s an infographic from OnlineMBA.com showing the competitors head-to-head.
Where would you rather do your shopping? Do you prefer one outlet over the other, or do you shop at both depending on your needs and circumstances?
Click image to see larger version.

[source: OnlineMBA]